So, the Government have released plans to encourage uptake of renewables, which Chris Goodall wrote about earlier in the week (his piece and the comments are worth reading). Yet, in the same week, a fantastic proposal to install a community renewables project in Birmingham failed at the planning stage:
“It is with some regret that SusMo must report that the application made by St. Mary’s Church with regards to the installation of a photovoltaic array on their south-facing roof has been turned down by the Planning Committee. We are very disappointed in their decision. Just last week, Birmingham launched its ‘Green New Deal’, and the City Council signed up to the 10:10, and for the Planning Committee to instantly reject a promising microgeneration project such as this has little resonance with those commitments, and bodes ill for Birmingham’s low carbon future”.
For most of us installing renewable technologies such as solar panels, groundsource heatpumps or wood pellet boilers etc will remain out of reach. Despite reports that the Government’s scheme will have a pay back of around £900 pounds a year, the upfront costs make sure it won’t be on my shopping list any time soon.
Writing in the Guardian Miles Brignall is optimistic about the benefits the scheme will bring to householders, quoting Ed Miliband
“The feed-in tariff will change the way householders and communities think about their future energy needs, making the payback for investment far shorter than in the past.”
Friends of mine installed solar panels a couple of years back and they do generate a significant amount of energy, thereby reducing the overall emissions of CO2 and for those who can afford it and have a suitable roof it’s an option that should be considered (after all measures to reduce energy demand have been taken which they did – see photo).
But for me, efficiency remains the primary route for tackling my household energy consumption. I think the situation is pretty similar for most of us – unless you happen to be a tennant of Housing Associations such as Wulvern who refurbished some of their homes with renewables technologies,making them warmer and cheaper to run, solar panels etc remain beyond reach until an effective loan or finance scheme is devised to assist people like me to get on the “renewables ladder”.
The example of Wulvern and other Housing Associations shows that renewables can be a smart choice for landlords, and schemes such as Low Carbon West Oxford’s large scale project to install photovoltaics on community buildings show that it is possible to create a local demand for renewable technologies which can be accessed by everyone, not just the affluent, where there is suffient will from planners and landlords to make it happen.
Of course, I’m just bitter because I can’t afford to borrow the money I’d need to take advantage of the new scheme, and our woodburner doesn’t qualify as it’s not a new installation. So, forgive the rant, at least I know my carbon footprint is heaing in a downward direction, and surely that’s the bottom line?












